|
Post by The Lucky C on Dec 13, 2006 20:57:06 GMT -1
But how does the killer/do the killers know who's one and who's not? Especially since the streets of Ipswich are probably emptying quickly It's easy enough to tell, as long as your outfits leave plenty to the imagination then you have absolutely nothing to worry about. i think he's more likely to pick them up first
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 13, 2006 21:41:23 GMT -1
Is it just me that thinks this guy (and assuming its a guy!!) may actually get away with it
|
|
|
Post by urrzzzzzzzzzz on Dec 13, 2006 21:42:46 GMT -1
Jack the ripper was never caught I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 13, 2006 21:45:02 GMT -1
I suppose things were different then though. Technology advacements and all...although many think it was that Prince that went abroard just after the last killing by 'Jack'
|
|
|
Post by urrzzzzzzzzzz on Dec 13, 2006 21:46:53 GMT -1
Anyway, you just said it. Technology has come on a long way. The police clearly don't have a clue at the moment, but I reckon they'll get there. I juts hope there isn't a stab in the dark arrest soon just to please the press, coz that's just wrong. Probably inevitable though .
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 13, 2006 21:50:03 GMT -1
I just have a feeling that he wont get caught. According to leading crimeologists he is coming around to the end of his killing circle..also backed up by the decade old unsolved prostitute killings and the schoolgirl in 1999
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 14, 2006 8:39:16 GMT -1
I just have a feeling that he wont get caught. According to leading crimeologists he is coming around to the end of his killing circle..also backed up by the decade old unsolved prostitute killings and the schoolgirl in 1999 Anything said by profilers, crimeologists etc is purely speculation at the moment. Unless the police are keeping the public in the dark about any evidence they may have (which I don't think they would, given that the public will want reassurance asap), there's no sightings, no forensics or anything else to work on. Yes, he might be coming to the end of his circle, but on the other hand he might not. Pure guesswork like that pisses me off If he does stop, it'll make the job much harder, but I don't believe it's impossible - it's generally accepted that with the techniques we have now, Jack the Ripper would've been caught quite early on. There's no such thing as a perfect murder, short of simply being able to think someone to death - there'll be a little evidence left somewhere; even burnt clothing can still provide clues. One piece can be all it takes to begin to close the net.
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 14, 2006 8:40:59 GMT -1
Well they say that a handbag and clothes have been found near where 2 of the girls were found so maybe this will provide some help...or maybe this persons clever and it has nothing to do with the investigation..
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 14, 2006 8:51:28 GMT -1
Well they say that a handbag and clothes have been found near where 2 of the girls were found so maybe this will provide some help...or maybe this persons clever and it has nothing to do with the investigation.. Indeed; we'll have to wait and see. Of course, if he was clever enough to plant false evidence, he should also have been clever enough to not let the bodies be found, unless the intention is to scare people away from prostituting. If that's the case, then he should've realised that some of them can't/won't stop, and so to achieve his goal, he'll have to strike again, when he now has all this police attention. This means he's backed himself into a corner, where he either carries out greater risks or admits defeat - and anyone who's hellbent enough to start this sort of thing is likely to be a very bad loser. Ergo, he'll force himself to strike again. That's why I'm reasonably sure he'll be caught - putting yourself in the mindset of a calculating killer, a madman or an extremist, you're likely to kill again regardless. That'll be where he slips up.
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 14, 2006 8:53:59 GMT -1
Well you know what your onabout more than me so I will agree
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 14, 2006 8:59:47 GMT -1
Well you know what your onabout more than me so I will agree I've spent many, many hours studying famous killers, and I've done a lot of work/play that involves getting into the mindset of others - I'm not a professional, but that could even be an advantage, because I'm going purely on experience and not textbooks methods too. I concede there's every chance I'm wrong - I'm only speculating too, after all - but I can put myself in a killer's mindset perhaps a little too well. Try to consider all his possible motives, and all the mindsets that could go with it - 80-90% of them suggest there'll be at least one more attack, even if it's meant to be his final swansong. The only thing that could bugger it up is a copycat attack... (I'd be interested to know exactly what he used to asphyxiate them though [hands, belt, cord etc], since that says a lot psychologically)
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 14, 2006 10:06:59 GMT -1
they are also consdiering poisoning Seems like this could go on.
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 14, 2006 11:39:01 GMT -1
Now that could be a key thing - how many blue BMWs are likely to have been in the area at the time? Surely it would've been caught on CCTV somewhere?
(I'm not deluding myself into believing that the owner of that car is necessarily the killer - it may not even be linked. Still an interesting point though.)
|
|
leicesterlass
Trainee
Retired. Catch me on facebook/e-mail on my profile if you wish.
Posts: 8
|
Post by leicesterlass on Dec 18, 2006 9:37:54 GMT -1
Detectives have arrested a man today on suspicion of murdering five prostitutes in Suffolk.
The 37-year-old was arrested at his home in Trimley, near Felixstowe, at 7.20am.
He is in custody at a police station in Suffolk and will be questioned later.
Detective Chief Superintendent Stewart Gull said: "He has been arrested on the suspicion of murdering all five women - Gemma Adams, Tania Nicol, Anneli Alderton, Paula Clennell and Annette Nicholls."
Mr Gull read out the short statement at Suffolk Police Headquarters and refused to take any questions about the investigation.
He did not name the man arrested, nor did he give details of the police station where he is being held.
He said: "As legal proceedings are now active, Suffolk police will not be issuing any further comments or appeals at this stage."
|
|
|
Post by Giar on Dec 18, 2006 9:41:40 GMT -1
good lets just hope they have the rite man
|
|
|
Post by miz on Dec 18, 2006 9:43:14 GMT -1
|
|
|
Post by Giar on Dec 18, 2006 9:47:04 GMT -1
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 18, 2006 9:50:05 GMT -1
Seconded. Where did that info come from anyway? (And at any rate, that profile says he's in Ipswich, when the arrested guy was in Trimley)
|
|
|
Post by miz on Dec 18, 2006 9:51:55 GMT -1
Seconded. Where did that info come from anyway? (And at any rate, that profile says he's in Ipswich, when the arrested guy was in Trimley) Well...We will see if the person who has been arrested is called Tom Stephens. I'm sure it wont be long until police reveal who it is.
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 18, 2006 9:55:38 GMT -1
Sidestepping the question!
|
|