|
|
Post by thales on Jun 25, 2007 12:46:54 GMT -1
Fee paid for henry, rumoured fee for darren bent!
another example of an overinflated price for an english player!!!
<see spurs are being stupid enough to pay it>
|
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Jun 25, 2007 12:52:03 GMT -1
 hope not
|
|
sheepshag
League 2 Player
[M0:24]DEVON RAMS
Posts: 105
|
Post by sheepshag on Jun 29, 2007 17:05:28 GMT -1
There is no way henry is only worth 16m when shevchenko went for 30m
|
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Jun 30, 2007 7:43:21 GMT -1
There is no way henry is only worth 16m when shevchenko went for 30m Chelsea being Chelsea they will pay over the odds for anyone cos clubs know they have so much money |
|
|
|
Post by CHOPPER READ on Jun 30, 2007 7:50:03 GMT -1
Does sound a bit much tbh.
|
|
|
|
Post by reddeviljai on Jun 30, 2007 8:49:34 GMT -1
i did hear it was more than what barca paid for henry.
hmmm, henry or bent? which would i choose..........
|
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Jun 30, 2007 8:51:58 GMT -1
i did hear it was more than what barca paid for henry. hmmm, henry or bent? which would i choose.......... you wouldnt have a choice...........Henry would never sign for you  |
|
|
|
Post by reddeviljai on Jun 30, 2007 8:57:58 GMT -1
if we had the choice though. it must make you a bit sick though, knowing you could have had henry for les money? |
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Jun 30, 2007 9:00:09 GMT -1
if we had the choice though. it must make you a bit sick though, knowing you could have had henry for les money? same reason, he would never sign for us either. Berbatov and Keane are our main strike force, Bent will be a good sub |
|
|
|
Post by reddeviljai on Jun 30, 2007 9:04:10 GMT -1
no reason he wouldnt sign for you lot. sol went the other way when no one thought he would.
£16 million is even more stupid if he is just gonna be considered a sub, mate!
|
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Jun 30, 2007 9:08:15 GMT -1
no reason he wouldnt sign for you lot. sol went the other way when no one thought he would. £16 million is even more stupid if he is just gonna be considered a sub, mate! he will play his fair share of games just like Defoe does, but he wont be first choice for the big games. As i have said in many threads i do think we paid to much for him, 8 - 10 mil would have been about right. I would rather have him than another prem team snap him up, he is a proven premiership scorer and that was when he was a one man team with Charlton. |
|
|
|
Post by reddeviljai on Jun 30, 2007 9:10:31 GMT -1
yeah, no argument. he does score goals.
|
|
