|
|
Post by Pete the Wolf on Dec 3, 2006 23:12:42 GMT -1
Enjoy! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 4, 2006 8:39:36 GMT -1
"Titanic 2 trailer" and "Enjoy" together? That was sarcasm, right?  I don't actually get how they can make a sequel to that - if it's a proper sequel, it'll be one of two things: 1) A look at what's happened to what's-'er-name since the Titanic sank - I can't exactly see that being a riveting film, somehow 2) A re-enactment of the trip that discovered the Titanic's wreck - if it's done as a film, it'll be dull as hell, and if it's done as a documentary... well, how many times has that been done already? A prequel showing the Lusitania might be interesting, mind... (For the record, I'm saying all this on the grounds that I can't see a link or video in the post above, though whether that's because work blocked it or there just isn't one, I don't know!) |
|
|
|
Post by Giar on Dec 4, 2006 8:41:34 GMT -1
umm were's the link?
|
|
|
|
Post by Super Danny Webber on Dec 4, 2006 8:44:18 GMT -1
It's hoax. WIKIPEDIA NEVER LIES!! |
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 4, 2006 8:45:24 GMT -1
Titanic 2..frigging hell how can you make a sequel about a ship that sank and it cant be a prequel because it was the maiden voyage  |
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 4, 2006 9:05:08 GMT -1
Titanic 2..frigging hell how can you make a sequel about a ship that sank and it cant be a prequel because it was the maiden voyage Like I said, it could be about the Lusitania - "Here's another ship that sank! Expect even more OTT acting and millions more computer sequences!" |
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 4, 2006 9:47:47 GMT -1
IF its true in the first place then if it is about the Lusitania why call it Titanic 2  Why wreck a perfectly shit film like titanic... |
|
|
|
Post by Lollipop on Dec 4, 2006 10:41:25 GMT -1
IF its true in the first place then if it is about the Lusitania why call it Titanic 2 Why wreck a perfectly shit film like titanic... It's a hoax!! It's an old hoax too! Der!  |
|
|
|
Post by Pete the Wolf on Dec 4, 2006 12:29:08 GMT -1
|
|
|
|
Post by CHOPPER READ on Dec 4, 2006 12:34:36 GMT -1
Because Hollywood can tell lies and get away with it AND make fucking millions in the process. Bit like the Bush and Blair administrations. Titanic 2..frigging hell how can you make a sequel about a ship that sank and it cant be a prequel because it was the maiden voyage |
|
|
|
Post by Teesside White on Dec 4, 2006 12:59:56 GMT -1
lol its just bits from other films put together i saw Con Air, Titanic, Austin Powers, Catch Me If You Can
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Dec 4, 2006 16:10:17 GMT -1
LOL Pete you dumbass!  All you had to remember was to post the link.... |
|
|
|
Post by Pete the Wolf on Dec 4, 2006 16:15:49 GMT -1
LOL Pete you dumbass! All you had to remember was to post the link.... Mate, I can barely do Physics at the moment! What makes you think I'd be able to do CompSci/Film Studies? |
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Dec 4, 2006 16:19:28 GMT -1
LOL Pete you dumbass! All you had to remember was to post the link.... Mate, I can barely do Physics at the moment! What makes you think I'd be able to do CompSci/Film Studies? Ha! Seems like your begging for the Xmas holidays to arrive! |
|
|
|
Post by Main Admin Account on Dec 4, 2006 18:51:45 GMT -1
IF its true in the first place then if it is about the Lusitania why call it Titanic 2 Why wreck a perfectly shit film like titanic... It's a hoax!! It's an old hoax too! Der!  No need to be so mean!!! |
|
Why wreck a perfectly shit film like titanic...
