|
|
Post by ITFC Dudette6 on Dec 29, 2007 21:08:58 GMT -1
I had a soft spot for Ipswich when I was at uni. You were always cool.  |
|
|
|
Post by GeoFox on Dec 29, 2007 21:13:13 GMT -1
I had a soft spot for Ipswich when I was at uni. You were always cool. I don't really have a problem with Norwich though, does that make me any less cooler? |
|
|
|
Post by PureOldGold on Dec 29, 2007 21:15:50 GMT -1
I had a soft spot for Ipswich when I was at uni. You were always cool. ahhhhhhh isn't that sweet |
|
|
|
Post by GresleyRam©®™ on Dec 29, 2007 21:18:55 GMT -1
think i read sumwhere about u stating coventry chavs,,, leicester is maybe the biggest chav place i can remember going 2, but every section of grounds sadly have a chav section now....  Leicester? Chavvy?!! Seriously, it's really not. You should see Coventry, mate - or Chaventry as it's known locally. ;D Leicester is not far behind Chaventry though - and this from a bloke who is in leicester 3 or 4 days a week before anyone says anything!! Just as an outsider looking in on this - Bluey said Ipswich were poor going forward, Geo says Leicester won at a canter - surely the two are saying the same thing?? If you are 2-0 up and the other team doesnt have a meaningful attack then 'canter' does spring to mind??? Oh, and another thing, can you not get a view on a game by listening to it, reading reports etc or do you have to actually be there to know whats going on??? Just an unbiast view on a petty argument.  |
|
|
|
Post by ITFC Dudette6 on Dec 29, 2007 21:20:05 GMT -1
You were always cool. I don't really have a problem with Norwich though, does that make me any less cooler? Yes. Sod off  |
|
|
|
Post by GeoFox on Dec 30, 2007 8:04:05 GMT -1
Leicester? Chavvy?!! Seriously, it's really not. You should see Coventry, mate - or Chaventry as it's known locally. ;D Just as an outsider looking in on this - Bluey said Ipswich were poor going forward, Geo says Leicester won at a canter - surely the two are saying the same thing?? If you are 2-0 up and the other team doesnt have a meaningful attack then 'canter' does spring to mind??? I admit Canter is probably too strong a word, as I was only listening but Baabaa on RL suggested Fulop didn't have much to do. We were poor but 2-0 up after half an hour, however it happened, the fact the next hour was a complete non-event only suited us, however boring that is. plus any flow in the game wouldn't have been helped by the 9 mins of stoppages in the 2nd half and the ref incident. Anyway, its all over now, we should let sleeping dogs lie. And Gres you chav, you're in Leicester more than me! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by GresleyRam©®™ on Dec 30, 2007 10:16:43 GMT -1
Just as an outsider looking in on this - Bluey said Ipswich were poor going forward, Geo says Leicester won at a canter - surely the two are saying the same thing?? If you are 2-0 up and the other team doesnt have a meaningful attack then 'canter' does spring to mind??? I admit Canter is probably too strong a word, as I was only listening but Baabaa on RL suggested Fulop didn't have much to do. We were poor but 2-0 up after half an hour, however it happened, the fact the next hour was a complete non-event only suited us, however boring that is. plus any flow in the game wouldn't have been helped by the 9 mins of stoppages in the 2nd half and the ref incident. Anyway, its all over now, we should let sleeping dogs lie. And Gres you chav, you're in Leicester more than me! ;D LMAO - maybe so, but at least i'm safe in the knowledge i'm only there a few hours a day before leaving!! ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by bluey69 on Dec 30, 2007 21:14:54 GMT -1
haha yeah its such a stupid n petty argument we've got into
as for " chaventry " no idea, not been since highfield road !!!
Leicester just have the home stood up section by the away fans that are chavvy, coventry probably have more !!!
n yeah, doesn't matter how u play if u win etc.
I get so bloody fed up with our lot. we try n play the game better than we can. On the eye we're pleasing to watch usually but with such a mixed bag of results !
|
|
