|
Post by Jules-Hovah on Jun 4, 2010 14:07:36 GMT -1
I can vouch that large cocks do exist! ;D (Here come the "CAV you are a large cock" comments) If the "8 inches" quoted elsewhere is correct, you are but a minnow compared to some of these guys... I'd have thought they'd pass out every time they got excited! (Too easy )
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Jun 4, 2010 21:03:39 GMT -1
Another one bites the dust.
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 4, 2010 22:21:34 GMT -1
Another one bites the dust. Alex, you must control those homicidal urges!
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Jun 4, 2010 22:25:17 GMT -1
Another one bites the dust. Alex, you must control those homicidal urges! *suicidal But yeah, she'd agreed to a second date, but all of a sudden stops replying to messages, and doesn't respond on Facebook. I'm at a loss as to an explanation. I've no idea what I've done wrong. I was a gentleman (as always) throughout.
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 5, 2010 6:26:11 GMT -1
Alex, you must control those homicidal urges! *suicidal But yeah, she'd agreed to a second date, but all of a sudden stops replying to messages, and doesn't respond on Facebook. I'm at a loss as to an explanation. I've no idea what I've done wrong. I was a gentleman (as always) throughout. I've learnt that being a gentleman's the wrong way to go about it. They always seem to go for the 'bad boys' because they're more fun, more excitement, more of a thrill - and then when they end up getting hurt, they turn to their 'good boy' friends who would plainly be a much better catch for them and who obviously has a thing for them, and bawl their eyes out about how there aren't any good guys out there [/mine and many's personal experiences] (And yes, I appreciate not all girls do this, but those that don't usually find a good guy and don't stray, hence they're not much good for singletons!) The trick seems to be finding the right balance between gentleman and bad boy for the right girl. Or just be yourself, and someone who actually appreciates it will (eventually) turn up They get sick of 'bad boys' eventually!
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 5, 2010 14:14:25 GMT -1
Very positive but i'm not sure i agree....
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 5, 2010 14:36:40 GMT -1
Very positive but i'm not sure i agree.... The above is all my experience, right down to Puppy (my girly) having said, "I'm sick of getting jerked around; it's nice to know that there's someone I can actually rely on now." She's also said that being with someone who was just a nice guy would be boring, so that supports my theory too
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 5, 2010 15:02:44 GMT -1
I think that theory is a standard one and flawed.... (though i'm sure most would disagree).
The whole 'bad boys' are more fun, more excitement, more of a thrill is simply an illusion, which most women, sadly, fail to realise till their 30s (or never), regardless of how many 'bad boys' they've been with and regardless of the fact they almost certainly all end up being very boring..... however thats another argument.
I'd put forward the theory that its easier for women to be with a 'bad boy'. Ultimately most 'bad boys' are simply flawed individuals, if you're a girl the offers you alot in terms of personal gratification; if you can stem the bad the behaviour you look awesome, said 'bad boy' becomes nothing more than a self-gratification project. And if the said "self-gratification project' happens to end up liking you or loving you deeply, then you are know in-control of the relationship with the ""bad boy"", how clever would that make a girl feel? And if it all goes horribly wrong, why who's fault is it well obviously its the flawed individual, not the girls!....
.... in other words the rewards of being with a flawed individual are obvious and in fact rather selfish, and actually the risk involved is probably less than those of being with a good person, afterall with a good person things should be equal, the emotional links are less tainted by personal issues and you have to except responsibilities.
Words like "fun", "excitement", "thrill" are all words people find behind to say i'm having what is ultimately meant to be a meaningless relationship because i'm too scared to be with someone that it might genuinely touch me deeply to be with.
I'm sure people will disagree with that, but ultimately you don't know if someone is exciting till you've been with them, but you can see the illusion they put out and when it comes to 'bad boys' it'd take a really muppet to not see the illusion.
(i should probably point out i've a habit of liking shall we say "bad women" so i'm not exactly without thought on this matter)
|
|
|
Post by derbiean on Jun 5, 2010 15:07:03 GMT -1
So it would seem Neko, as the woman im seeing said she felt a relationship with me would be "safe" but unfortunately the last thing i've heard from her was a few weeks ago from a text message saying she felt stressed about us but wasn't sure why and she would call me when her head was on straight, that and a couple of other things have made me question if i want to continue a relationship with her or just tell her we're better off being friends
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 5, 2010 15:35:57 GMT -1
Truthfully, Mort, you do have a point to your argument, but the reality probably falls in a mix between both our sides. I think you're perhaps assuming that females as a whole are more shallow than is really the case, and also that they're less mature than may be the case. All in all, I think the safe conclusion is that they're just too bloody complicated and need to sort it out
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 5, 2010 15:42:21 GMT -1
Truthfully, Mort, you do have a point to your argument, but the reality probably falls in a mix between both our sides. I think you're perhaps assuming that females as a whole are more shallow than is really the case, and also that they're less mature than may be the case. Actually i think your idea suggests they're shallow, mine suggests they're as scared. I think my ideas on 'Bad Boys' are basically interchangeable with why i think (most) men like 'Bimbos' - we're basically the same. All in all, I think the safe conclusion is that they're just too bloody complicated and need to sort it out AGREED!
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Jun 5, 2010 16:36:07 GMT -1
*suicidal But yeah, she'd agreed to a second date, but all of a sudden stops replying to messages, and doesn't respond on Facebook. I'm at a loss as to an explanation. I've no idea what I've done wrong. I was a gentleman (as always) throughout. I've learnt that being a gentleman's the wrong way to go about it. They always seem to go for the 'bad boys' because they're more fun, more excitement, more of a thrill - and then when they end up getting hurt, they turn to their 'good boy' friends who would plainly be a much better catch for them and who obviously has a thing for them, and bawl their eyes out about how there aren't any good guys out there [/mine and many's personal experiences] (And yes, I appreciate not all girls do this, but those that don't usually find a good guy and don't stray, hence they're not much good for singletons!) The trick seems to be finding the right balance between gentleman and bad boy for the right girl. Or just be yourself, and someone who actually appreciates it will (eventually) turn up They get sick of 'bad boys' eventually! Thanks Neko. I've often thought the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 8, 2010 9:27:25 GMT -1
I think that theory is a standard one and flawed.... (though i'm sure most would disagree). The whole 'bad boys' are more fun, more excitement, more of a thrill is simply an illusion, which most women, sadly, fail to realise till their 30s (or never), regardless of how many 'bad boys' they've been with and regardless of the fact they almost certainly all end up being very boring..... however thats another argument. I'd put forward the theory that its easier for women to be with a 'bad boy'. Ultimately most 'bad boys' are simply flawed individuals, if you're a girl the offers you alot in terms of personal gratification; if you can stem the bad the behaviour you look awesome, said 'bad boy' becomes nothing more than a self-gratification project. And if the said "self-gratification project' happens to end up liking you or loving you deeply, then you are know in-control of the relationship with the ""bad boy"", how clever would that make a girl feel? And if it all goes horribly wrong, why who's fault is it well obviously its the flawed individual, not the girls!.... .... in other words the rewards of being with a flawed individual are obvious and in fact rather selfish, and actually the risk involved is probably less than those of being with a good person, afterall with a good person things should be equal, the emotional links are less tainted by personal issues and you have to except responsibilities. Words like "fun", "excitement", "thrill" are all words people find behind to say i'm having what is ultimately meant to be a meaningless relationship because i'm too scared to be with someone that it might genuinely touch me deeply to be with. I'm sure people will disagree with that, but ultimately you don't know if someone is exciting till you've been with them, but you can see the illusion they put out and when it comes to 'bad boys' it'd take a really muppet to not see the illusion. (i should probably point out i've a habit of liking shall we say "bad women" so i'm not exactly without thought on this matter) Sounds about right Morton but can I also put to you that all individuals are in some way fucked up and we shouldn't essentially be allowed to breed.
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 8, 2010 9:29:58 GMT -1
I think that theory is a standard one and flawed.... (though i'm sure most would disagree). The whole 'bad boys' are more fun, more excitement, more of a thrill is simply an illusion, which most women, sadly, fail to realise till their 30s (or never), regardless of how many 'bad boys' they've been with and regardless of the fact they almost certainly all end up being very boring..... however thats another argument. I'd put forward the theory that its easier for women to be with a 'bad boy'. Ultimately most 'bad boys' are simply flawed individuals, if you're a girl the offers you alot in terms of personal gratification; if you can stem the bad the behaviour you look awesome, said 'bad boy' becomes nothing more than a self-gratification project. And if the said "self-gratification project' happens to end up liking you or loving you deeply, then you are know in-control of the relationship with the ""bad boy"", how clever would that make a girl feel? And if it all goes horribly wrong, why who's fault is it well obviously its the flawed individual, not the girls!.... .... in other words the rewards of being with a flawed individual are obvious and in fact rather selfish, and actually the risk involved is probably less than those of being with a good person, afterall with a good person things should be equal, the emotional links are less tainted by personal issues and you have to except responsibilities. Words like "fun", "excitement", "thrill" are all words people find behind to say i'm having what is ultimately meant to be a meaningless relationship because i'm too scared to be with someone that it might genuinely touch me deeply to be with. I'm sure people will disagree with that, but ultimately you don't know if someone is exciting till you've been with them, but you can see the illusion they put out and when it comes to 'bad boys' it'd take a really muppet to not see the illusion. (i should probably point out i've a habit of liking shall we say "bad women" so i'm not exactly without thought on this matter) Sounds about right Morton but can I also put to you that all individuals are in some way fucked up and we shouldn't essentially be allowed to breed. i'm doing my bit... or not as the case maybe
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 8, 2010 9:44:59 GMT -1
Sounds about right Morton but can I also put to you that all individuals are in some way fucked up and we shouldn't essentially be allowed to breed. i'm doing my bit... or not as the case maybe Me too. We're good for the planet Morton ;D
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 8, 2010 9:45:00 GMT -1
I reckon I should be allowed to breed en masse, with national governments paying the child benefits. The world could do with a few more of me! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 8, 2010 9:46:28 GMT -1
I reckon I should be allowed to breed en masse, with national governments paying the child benefits. The world could do with a few more of me! ;D Is that you Kim Jong Il?
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 8, 2010 9:50:45 GMT -1
i'm doing my bit... or not as the case maybe Me too. We're good for the planet Morton ;D ... yet slightly angst ridden for some reason...
|
|
|
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Jun 8, 2010 9:52:46 GMT -1
I reckon I should be allowed to breed en masse, with national governments paying the child benefits. The world could do with a few more of me! ;D Is that you Kim Jong Il? Are you ronery, neko?
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 8, 2010 9:53:59 GMT -1
Me too. We're good for the planet Morton ;D ... yet slightly angst ridden for some reason... That's the lack of sex. If sex was just for pleasure we'd all be ok.
|
|