|
Post by Dr LuKas on Feb 28, 2007 9:43:50 GMT -1
Morning Hurley, (I can call you that can't I?)
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 9:48:48 GMT -1
Morning Hurley, (I can call you that can't I?) course you can fella hows your funky self, looks like we shall be playing you next season - I feel your pain as it's what I had to endure last season!
|
|
|
Post by Dr LuKas on Feb 28, 2007 9:51:11 GMT -1
Cheers Yeah it's starting to sink in and I don't like it.
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 9:53:36 GMT -1
Cheers Yeah it's starting to sink in and I don't like it. No worries Don't blame you, however there is still time! Keep the faith brother
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Feb 28, 2007 9:56:13 GMT -1
Have you ever met someone in the work place who is successful and nice, by what I mean is two faced or the likes. I know some people who are reasonably wealthy and are alright, however generally money appears to (on top of other problems) make people insufferably arrogant and contemptuous towards their fellow man... Funny how you half agree, but at the end of the day you say you'd go part of the way. I want a decent living but I struggle and strive to avoid becoming one of the leeches that I know (and that I see friends turning into) as they desperately slither after as many bucks as they can cram into their maw. Whew... I'm sounding a little extreme but hey... my words have flights don't they? Quite. Aye it'd have been better if Candle in the Wind (pt2) had never been written!!!
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 10:01:20 GMT -1
Have you ever met someone in the work place who is successful and nice, by what I mean is two faced or the likes. I know some people who are reasonably wealthy and are alright, however generally money appears to (on top of other problems) make people insufferably arrogant and contemptuous towards their fellow man... Funny how you half agree, but at the end of the day you say you'd go part of the way. I want a decent living but I struggle and strive to avoid becoming one of the leeches that I know (and that I see friends turning into) as they desperately slither after as many bucks as they can cram into their maw. Whew... I'm sounding a little extreme but hey... my words have flights don't they? Quite. Aye it'd have been better if Candle in the Wind (pt2) had never been written!!! Mate, I think we need to meet for a beer - would make for interesting debate. Is it wrong to be a success, and whatever you say we are different animals at work. To want the best for your partner family etc., because no ones going to give you the leg up you have to earn it. Tell you what really fucks me off - no I'll save that for the beer
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Feb 28, 2007 10:14:25 GMT -1
Mate, I think we need to meet for a beer - would make for interesting debate. Is it wrong to be a success, and whatever you say we are different animals at work. To want the best for your partner family etc., because no ones going to give you the leg up you have to earn it. Tell you what really fucks me off - no I'll save that for the beer Aye fair enough... though I find beer makes me less articulate! I'll see what I can do though. I'm better writing than talking on these matters. Define "success" - if you mean wealthy at a significant cost to other people's health wealth and happiness then I'd say yes. In principle, and hopefully in practice. Obviously I don't disagree with your commitment to your family. As for "earning" - that's again a matter of debate, I'm sure you see what I mean there. Heh okay it can wait, as long as you aren't a violent drinker!
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 10:41:52 GMT -1
Thats what makes it fun!
Success, in my eyes is to be comfortable - which means money is not a concern - so you have to earn circa £50K if you have a family in tow. But on your own the £35K bracket should see you right!
No I don't do violence, and hope I've not given that impression here
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Feb 28, 2007 10:58:54 GMT -1
Thats what makes it fun! Success, in my eyes is to be comfortable - which means money is not a concern - so you have to earn circa £50K if you have a family in tow. But on your own the £35K bracket should see you right! No I don't do violence, and hope I've not given that impression here LOL very true!!! Hmmm must admit I've not thought that hard about it, but I think that is achievable personally without having to screw anyone over... course I guess we're among the luckier ones... Nah mate no worries, just pointing out that some people change when they're drunk! One of my best mates is like that, fortunately though he only gets verbally angry...
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 11:04:47 GMT -1
Gladly I'm a happy drunk
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Feb 28, 2007 11:10:41 GMT -1
Likewise my friend besides I am sure we shall tire of the weightier topics long before the fall-off-chair stage! Remind me, you're based on the South side aren't you? I think we should go for somewhere central again as I'm NW and you're SE?
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 11:20:19 GMT -1
Likewise my friend besides I am sure we shall tire of the weightier topics long before the fall-off-chair stage! Remind me, you're based on the South side aren't you? I think we should go for somewhere central again as I'm NW and you're SE? I'm SE mate, centrale makes sense - see if Arnie etc., are up for it! 606 Debate
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Feb 28, 2007 11:24:31 GMT -1
I'm off to me a meeting mate - back tomorrow or maybe later.
Ciao
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Feb 28, 2007 11:26:00 GMT -1
I'm SE mate, centrale makes sense - see if Arnie etc., are up for it! 606 Debate bonzer as they say in Oz. yep you can make up for missing the last 606 London Crew outing! I'll sort it out in a bit - gotta have lunch with some work colleagues now 'n' that...
|
|
|
Post by Shippers on Feb 28, 2007 11:59:13 GMT -1
we had a chinese girl in our office yesterday called fanny fuang.
|
|
|
Post by officergroyman on Feb 28, 2007 13:38:08 GMT -1
we had a chinese girl in our office yesterday called fanny fuang. aka Double F'er !!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by officergroyman on Feb 28, 2007 14:54:54 GMT -1
It's what happens when you embrace capitalism - it's not always up, up, up. Or would you prefer China to still be communist? The Communist Party of China (CPC) has led the PRC under a one-party system since the state's establishment in 1949.
|
|
|
Post by The Lucky C on Feb 28, 2007 14:58:44 GMT -1
It's what happens when you embrace capitalism - it's not always up, up, up. Or would you prefer China to still be communist? The Communist Party of China (CPC) has led the PRC under a one-party system since the state's establishment in 1949. This is true, but to what extent can China truly be called Communist? If the difference between communist and capitalist countries is a neconomic one, the China ceased being a communist state in the mid-1990's when it abandoned it's Marxist economic policies and adopted a neo-liberal market based economy. Therefore China cannot be called a communist state (no matter how much it claims otherwise) but in actuality a capitalist dictatorship. To paraphrase: Shovng feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.
|
|
|
Post by officergroyman on Feb 28, 2007 15:17:00 GMT -1
The Communist Party of China (CPC) has led the PRC under a one-party system since the state's establishment in 1949. This is true, but to what extent can China truly be called Communist? If the difference between communist and capitalist countries is a neconomic one, the China ceased being a communist state in the mid-1990's when it abandoned it's Marxist economic policies and adopted a neo-liberal market based economy. Therefore China cannot be called a communist state (no matter how much it claims otherwise) but in actuality a capitalist dictatorship. To paraphrase: Shovng feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. I guess you'd have to be there huh!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by The Lucky C on Feb 28, 2007 15:54:28 GMT -1
This is true, but to what extent can China truly be called Communist? If the difference between communist and capitalist countries is a neconomic one, the China ceased being a communist state in the mid-1990's when it abandoned it's Marxist economic policies and adopted a neo-liberal market based economy. Therefore China cannot be called a communist state (no matter how much it claims otherwise) but in actuality a capitalist dictatorship. To paraphrase: Shovng feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. I guess you'd have to be there huh!! ;D I have my moments. Normally either with the economy of Asain countries or Celta Vigo. ;D
|
|