|
Post by GresleyRam©®™ on Dec 18, 2007 20:29:50 GMT -1
'You could take on 29 five year old kids in a fight' my height and reach advantage scored well, but only doing enough to win the fight lost me a couple i reckon! ;D Its bollox anyway - i could sit on 29 5 year olds and not be uncomfortable!
|
|
Goalposts for Jumpers
Sunday League Player
Posting on message boards is a lot like making love to a beautiful woman.....
Posts: 44
|
Post by Goalposts for Jumpers on Dec 18, 2007 20:40:28 GMT -1
32! I'll ask my youngest to arrange a scrap between me and his year 1 classmates as soon as possible...I feel sure I could beat more than 32 even if they did swarm at me mercilessly! Little buggers!
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 18, 2007 21:45:59 GMT -1
32! I'll ask my youngest to arrange a scrap between me and his year 1 classmates as soon as possible...I feel sure I could beat more than 32 even if they did swarm at me mercilessly! Little buggers! I dunno; you have to allow for the fact that the little fuckers are virtually indestructible. They're like cats; you punt 'em out the window, and they just hit the ground, spring straight back in - even five storeys high - and go for the eyes. Ten at once; you're knocking five down while the other five are springing back up again. They grab a limb each, and while you're dislodging them, the other five spring back at you. It's a tougher concept than it first appears!
|
|
|
Post by officergroyman on Dec 18, 2007 22:42:17 GMT -1
You could take on 39 five year old kids in a fight.
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Dec 18, 2007 23:12:11 GMT -1
OG, the kid-killing machine! A Ted Bundy in the making?
|
|
|
Post by ArgyleNeil on Dec 19, 2007 10:44:01 GMT -1
34 apparently
|
|