|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 19:50:57 GMT -1
Post by IWEDFM on Mar 17, 2009 19:50:57 GMT -1
shame none of thats happened and our name still has more worth than yours It doesn't though
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 19:55:13 GMT -1
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Mar 17, 2009 19:55:13 GMT -1
shame none of thats happened and our name still has more worth than yours It doesn't though oh it does ;D no one cares about Wednesday
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 19:57:09 GMT -1
Post by IWEDFM on Mar 17, 2009 19:57:09 GMT -1
oh it does ;D no one cares about Wednesday 2-0 2-2 1-0 2-1 Ssssssssshhhhhh
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:11:00 GMT -1
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Mar 17, 2009 20:11:00 GMT -1
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:12:39 GMT -1
Post by IWEDFM on Mar 17, 2009 20:12:39 GMT -1
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:13:11 GMT -1
Post by PureOldGold on Mar 17, 2009 20:13:11 GMT -1
Oh dear, is this farce still going on.
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:14:43 GMT -1
Post by Kentucky Kid on Mar 17, 2009 20:14:43 GMT -1
oh it does ;D no one cares about Wednesday 2-0 2-2 1-0 2-1 Ssssssssshhhhhh exalted ;D ;D
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:18:36 GMT -1
Post by IWEDFM on Mar 17, 2009 20:18:36 GMT -1
Oh dear, is this farce still going on. Yep, 'fraid so We're just waiting for the hot-dog man outside Bramall Lane to launch his appeal against a loss of earnings...
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 17, 2009 20:21:11 GMT -1
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Mar 17, 2009 20:21:11 GMT -1
Oh dear, is this farce still going on. Yep, 'fraid so We're just waiting for the hot-dog man outside Bramall Lane to launch his appeal against a loss of earnings... he's moved across the road
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 18, 2009 21:45:47 GMT -1
Post by Mrs H on Mar 18, 2009 21:45:47 GMT -1
I actually feel sorry for West Ham now - i know the broke rules but it was the Premier League who fined them and they paid up. It's the fucking premier League that should be sued now...not West Ham. thats not why they're paying up, which was precisely my point. West Ham gave assurances to the Premier League when they decided to fine them, that Tevez was no longer third party owned but now actually owned by West Ham. On that premise Tevez was believed to be eligible to play the rest of the season., which he promptly did. The reality however is that he was still owned by a third party, as he still is, and was not eligible to play out the season at West Ham! - The premier league took no action over this, hence why it went to tribunal and why we were judged to be allowed compensation. A previous tribunal had found that in relation to the initial breach of rules the Premier League had dealt with the situation by fining West Ham its the subsequent breach after this fine is what we're recieving compensation for and what the fa nad premier league FINALLY announced they'd investigate last month. The simply reality is NOT that we'd have stayed up had West Ham had not played Tevez - Which is essentially what most people WRONGLY assume is the issue! (see Mrs H) The issue is that in every other league and in every other sport for fielding an ineligible West Ham WOULD have be docked points or THROWN OUT of the league - In the Premier League they weren't, yet DESPITE THIS they continued to commit THE SAME BREACH after PROMISES THAT THEY WOULD NOT and then recieve NO FURTHER PUNISHMENT from the Premier League, to the deteriment of other clubs. The fact we got relegated is almost irrelevant, its the financial loss incurred by West Ham's breaches of the Rules that is important. Oi don't drag me into this squirt. I said you deserved to go down because you chucked away a 10 point safety cushion by being the shite 2 bob bent outfit that you are.
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 18, 2009 21:52:02 GMT -1
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Mar 18, 2009 21:52:02 GMT -1
thats not why they're paying up, which was precisely my point. West Ham gave assurances to the Premier League when they decided to fine them, that Tevez was no longer third party owned but now actually owned by West Ham. On that premise Tevez was believed to be eligible to play the rest of the season., which he promptly did. The reality however is that he was still owned by a third party, as he still is, and was not eligible to play out the season at West Ham! - The premier league took no action over this, hence why it went to tribunal and why we were judged to be allowed compensation. A previous tribunal had found that in relation to the initial breach of rules the Premier League had dealt with the situation by fining West Ham its the subsequent breach after this fine is what we're recieving compensation for and what the fa nad premier league FINALLY announced they'd investigate last month. The simply reality is NOT that we'd have stayed up had West Ham had not played Tevez - Which is essentially what most people WRONGLY assume is the issue! (see Mrs H) The issue is that in every other league and in every other sport for fielding an ineligible West Ham WOULD have be docked points or THROWN OUT of the league - In the Premier League they weren't, yet DESPITE THIS they continued to commit THE SAME BREACH after PROMISES THAT THEY WOULD NOT and then recieve NO FURTHER PUNISHMENT from the Premier League, to the deteriment of other clubs. The fact we got relegated is almost irrelevant, its the financial loss incurred by West Ham's breaches of the Rules that is important. Oi don't drag me into this squirt. I said you deserved to go down because you chucked away a 10 point safety cushion by being the shite 2 bob bent outfit that you are. you're dragged into smelly
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 18, 2009 21:53:56 GMT -1
Post by Mrs H on Mar 18, 2009 21:53:56 GMT -1
Do you have an rss feed that notifies you everytime I respond to one of your posts sweetie pie? ;D
|
|
|
FFS!
Mar 18, 2009 21:57:44 GMT -1
Post by El Morto La Hoja! on Mar 18, 2009 21:57:44 GMT -1
no, i'm psychic.... ... i presume you use rss to monitor me then
|
|