|
Post by PASTIE on Sept 17, 2007 22:20:14 GMT -1
Well I mean... And anyway, I just checked - it is only you, me and ArgyleSmurf online. I think life is too short for this thread
|
|
|
Post by PASTIE on Sept 17, 2007 22:20:46 GMT -1
where is that by the way Ask a Geography teacher
|
|
|
Post by Argyle_Smurf on Sept 17, 2007 22:27:30 GMT -1
Isn't that between Devonport and Keyham?
|
|
|
Post by BW on Sept 17, 2007 22:31:29 GMT -1
I'm not going away so answer me - Spozz Just another Amelda Marcos shoe shine girl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by BW on Sept 17, 2007 22:33:06 GMT -1
Well I mean... And anyway, I just checked - it is only you, me and ArgyleSmurf online. I think life is too short for this thread That mean your off??
|
|
|
Post by PASTIE on Sept 17, 2007 22:35:26 GMT -1
Well I mean... And anyway, I just checked - it is only you, me and ArgyleSmurf online. I think life is too short for this thread That mean your off?? Hey, no offence meant. Thing is I like it on here as a mellow and usually inane form of distraction that has happily led to meeting a group of people on match days and another group that I would love to meet and in Gres' case somebody I can pester by text message when drunk. There's just no need for anybody to be spending time o n here getting cross with anybody about anything!
|
|
|
Post by BW on Sept 17, 2007 22:40:52 GMT -1
Tell that to Spozz then!!
Yeah your right - thanks
Exalt in a min!!
|
|
|
Post by Argyle_Smurf on Sept 17, 2007 22:42:13 GMT -1
Hey, no offence meant. Thing is I like it on here as a mellow and usually inane form of distraction that has happily led to meeting a group of people on match days and another group that I would love to meet and in Gres' case somebody I can pester by text message when drunk. There's just no need for anybody to be spending time o n here getting cross with anybody about anything! Well said, sir. That man for Mod...
|
|
|
Post by BW on Sept 17, 2007 22:42:41 GMT -1
There you go
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Sept 18, 2007 7:39:28 GMT -1
The hole point of the matter is that POG has not directly asked me to do anything for him!!!!! The second point is that if my voice is silenced then I will endeavour to make it heard - lock this thread and I will start a new one. Thirdly as a moderator you are supposed to be impartial, therefore by commenting on POG's campaign as you have done is nothing more than discrimination. I went OFFLINE, that means, by some definition, that one cannot post as one is not logged in. Or didn't you notice? Hahaha, sorry but your 'points' just smack of arse and elbow Who said anything about POG asking you to campaign? If you want to campaign for him, that's up to you. You really are missing the blatantly obvious The thread that you posted on before was locked because there as no need for any other messages to be posted under it; had anyone else posted, I would've suggested the same, that it be locked. LOL discrimination I've also commented on numerous other candidates and the way they have conducted themselves, don't think you're getting special treatment. I am being impartial, I'm actually offering some friendly advice but if you don't want to take it, that's fine..
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Sept 18, 2007 7:43:16 GMT -1
LOL discrimination I've also commented on numerous other candidates and the way they have conducted themselves, don't think you're getting special treatment. I am being impartial, I'm actually offering some friendly advice but if you don't want to take it, that's fine.. I can vouch for Lolly's impartiality ........ she hates all the candidates and the people who campaign for them equally. She very misanthropic like that!!
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Sept 18, 2007 7:45:00 GMT -1
LOL discrimination I've also commented on numerous other candidates and the way they have conducted themselves, don't think you're getting special treatment. I am being impartial, I'm actually offering some friendly advice but if you don't want to take it, that's fine.. I can vouch for Lolly's impartiality ........ she hates all the candidates and the people who campaign for them equally. She very misanthropic like that!! 'We are all as one' because our names are in black I should tell BW to get in the Cav wannabe queue behind you eh *joke, before anyone goes off the rails *
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Sept 18, 2007 7:48:21 GMT -1
'We are all as one' because our names are in black I should tell BW to get in the Cav wannabe queue behind you eh *joke, before anyone goes off the rails * Not at all, some of you are quite reasonable ......... and some not so much!! You are, ....... as usual way off the mark ............ you old misanthrope!!
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Sept 18, 2007 7:52:10 GMT -1
'We are all as one' because our names are in black I should tell BW to get in the Cav wannabe queue behind you eh *joke, before anyone goes off the rails * Not at all some of you are quite reasonable ......... and some not so much!! You are, ....... as usual way off the mark ............ you old misanthrope!! Is it unreasonable to offer a candidate some friendly advice? Then again I rather think we're used to being accused of running some sort of dictatorship under mass censorship Misanthrope.. That's rather harsh
|
|
|
Post by thales on Sept 18, 2007 7:55:18 GMT -1
A vote for me is a vote wasted <as not running>
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Sept 18, 2007 7:55:21 GMT -1
Why is there a need for all the defensiveness, it does smack a little of 'here's that super toy you've wanted Johnny, but you can't have the batteries'
I do agree that the moderators should be completely impartial, because they are in a position of influence. Therefore their input is not fair, as we the members are the voters.
I hate saying the obvious but it does seem necessary
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Sept 18, 2007 7:58:50 GMT -1
Why is there a need for all the defensiveness, it does smack a little of 'here's that super toy you've wanted Johnny, but you can't have the batteries' I do agree that the moderators should be completely impartial, because they are in a position of influence. Therefore their input is not fair, as we the members are the voters. I hate saying the obvious but it does seem necessary Censor the mods then? It's all a right to free speech, I wouldn't say I'm in a position of more influence, that's for the members to decide but I'm hardly holding a knife to your throats telling you how to campaign and who to vote for. BW's argument is based on nothing more than a thread being locked and suddenly I'm accused of all sorts from nothing.
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Sept 18, 2007 7:58:58 GMT -1
Is it unreasonable to offer a candidate some friendly advice? Then again I rather think we're used to being accused of running some sort of dictatorship under mass censorship Misanthrope.. That's rather harsh Then make your friendly advice sound more like friendly advice than some kind of diktat!! Well you are rather down on people at the moment!! ...... would likening you instead to the boards overly fussy mother be any better!!
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Sept 18, 2007 8:00:20 GMT -1
Why is there a need for all the defensiveness, it does smack a little of 'here's that super toy you've wanted Johnny, but you can't have the batteries' I do agree that the moderators should be completely impartial, because they are in a position of influence. Therefore their input is not fair, as we the members are the voters. I hate saying the obvious but it does seem necessary Well said Hurls!! Although I didn't think that by and large you favoured democracy!!
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Sept 18, 2007 8:06:27 GMT -1
Why is there a need for all the defensiveness, it does smack a little of 'here's that super toy you've wanted Johnny, but you can't have the batteries' I do agree that the moderators should be completely impartial, because they are in a position of influence. Therefore their input is not fair, as we the members are the voters. I hate saying the obvious but it does seem necessary Censor the mods then? It's all a right to free speech, I wouldn't say I'm in a position of more influence, that's for the members to decide but I'm hardly holding a knife to your throats telling you how to campaign and who to vote for. BW's argument is based on nothing more than a thread being locked and suddenly I'm accused of all sorts from nothing. I'll repeat why the defensiveness, personally I thought fair play to whoever get this. However some reactions to simple questions begs the question is there something sinister amist and will this be dealt with fairly. This is a messageboard, and all of the goings on are conjecture!
|
|