|
Post by jh1980 on Aug 8, 2007 9:07:09 GMT -1
but you are being a snob on the basis of someones social standing, the word you used was Chav! double standards, she could be a lovely girl that had to look after her mother instead of accepting the scholarship at Oxford I think you'd probably find "Chav" fitted in with Marx's term "lumpen proletariat" Indeed she could... you could hardly criticise me for only going for Oxford graduates, indeed I only ever got with one Oxford student while there... though the phrase "dammit" does follow that memory rather sharply...
|
|
|
Post by Shippers on Aug 8, 2007 9:07:29 GMT -1
but you are being a snob on the basis of someones social standing, the word you used was Chav! double standards, she could be a lovely girl that had to look after her mother instead of accepting the scholarship at Oxford why are we assuming girls cannot look good if they're, for want of a better word, 'poor'. Working class gilrs don't have to look like chavs no more than middle class girls all look gorgeous. Jules said he doesn't go for that 'kappa slapper' style and I can't blame him, but where did he rule out all working class girls. And the fact that she could be a potential oxford student looking a chav (and the fact that presumably Julius would still turn her down based on looks) disproves your argument.
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Aug 8, 2007 9:08:56 GMT -1
But this goes against your Trotsky everyone is equal view on life, afterall it maybe that she can't afford the best because she's a min wage girl. Caught you out here! No, I don't see how being able to express an aesthetic judgment on the appearance of potential sexual partners contradicts socialist ideals one iota! (to be rather wordy and pompous about it! ) I think what Hurls is saying is he takes his conservative ideals and places them in all facets of his life ........ including the idea of screwing the poor!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Shippers on Aug 8, 2007 9:09:48 GMT -1
No, I don't see how being able to express an aesthetic judgment on the appearance of potential sexual partners contradicts socialist ideals one iota! (to be rather wordy and pompous about it! ) I think what Hurls is saying is he takes his conservative ideals and places them in all facets of his life ........ including the idea of screwing the poor!! ;D haha
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Aug 8, 2007 9:11:06 GMT -1
but you are being a snob on the basis of someones social standing, the word you used was Chav! double standards, she could be a lovely girl that had to look after her mother instead of accepting the scholarship at Oxford why are we assuming girls cannot look good if they're, for want of a better word, 'poor'. Working class gilrs don't have to look like chavs no more than middle class girls all look gorgeous. Jules said he doesn't go for that 'kappa slapper' style and I can't blame him, but where did he rule out all working class girls. And the fact that she could be a potential oxford student looking a chav (and the fact that presumably Julius would still turn her down based on looks) disproves your argument. I didn't say that working class girls can't look good, where did I say that! Are you saying Jules would turn her down on the basis that there would be more to her vocab than fuck off or because shes not a cambridge girl
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Aug 8, 2007 9:12:35 GMT -1
why are we assuming girls cannot look good if they're, for want of a better word, 'poor'. Working class gilrs don't have to look like chavs no more than middle class girls all look gorgeous. Jules said he doesn't go for that 'kappa slapper' style and I can't blame him, but where did he rule out all working class girls. And the fact that she could be a potential oxford student looking a chav (and the fact that presumably Julius would still turn her down based on looks) disproves your argument. "Of lower socio-economic status" might have covered it! Absolutely, some of the least attractive women I've met - in terms looks and personality - have been posh horsey girls. The phrase "kappa slapper" does indeed pretty much make me recoil! Yes it was as I say an aesthetic judgment.
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Aug 8, 2007 9:14:00 GMT -1
I think what Hurls is saying is he takes his conservative ideals and places them in all facets of his life ........ including the idea of screwing the poor!! ;D LOL I dunno, surely Hurls in one sense is liberal - he'll sleep with anyone! ;D
|
|
|
Post by jh1980 on Aug 8, 2007 9:20:02 GMT -1
Are you saying Jules would turn her down on the basis that there would be more to her vocab than fuck off or because shes not a cambridge girl He's saying I wouldn't go for someone who looked a certain way, there's no controversy there, that's the same as everyone else. If the look or style of a person doesn't attract you, you're unlikely to want to sleep with them!
|
|