|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:31:05 GMT -1
I quite like Lee's PM way- although it would be quite time-consuming I don't think it is fair
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Jan 4, 2007 16:31:11 GMT -1
Do it randomly.... however just my suggestions...Lee you're way is imho not very fair as without realizing it, you will give the bigger teams to the well known people and your mates. When I did sweepstakes like this I printed off all the teams and put them in a hat and then drew them 1 by 1 starting at 64.. hows that? takes effort though No you dumbass cos i wont know who lolly picked will i...shell just pm me saying pick a side...i wont know who shes picked though...do you get it
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jan 4, 2007 16:31:54 GMT -1
If you're just going to randomly draw teams then leave the list as it is or you'll be on all night Jen. 2 posters are already fighting over no 8!
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:32:03 GMT -1
Do it randomly.... however just my suggestions...Lee you're way is imho not very fair as without realizing it, you will give the bigger teams to the well known people and your mates. When I did sweepstakes like this I printed off all the teams and put them in a hat and then drew them 1 by 1 starting at 64.. hows that? takes effort though No you dumbass cos i wont know who lolly picked will i...shell just pm me saying pick a side...i wont know who shes picked though...do you get it
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:32:46 GMT -1
If you're just going to randomly draw teams then leave the list as it is or you'll be on all night Jen. 2 posters are already fighting over no 8! No they're not...I want 17...I just think we should stick to original numbers
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jan 4, 2007 16:33:10 GMT -1
I think dumbass is being very generous Do it randomly.... however just my suggestions...Lee you're way is imho not very fair as without realizing it, you will give the bigger teams to the well known people and your mates. When I did sweepstakes like this I printed off all the teams and put them in a hat and then drew them 1 by 1 starting at 64.. hows that? takes effort though No you dumbass cos i wont know who lolly picked will i...shell just pm me saying pick a side...i wont know who shes picked though...do you get it
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Jan 4, 2007 16:33:53 GMT -1
I think dumbass is being very generous No you dumbass cos i wont know who lolly picked will i...shell just pm me saying pick a side...i wont know who shes picked though...do you get it Lol....well ...
|
|
|
Post by Lollipop on Jan 4, 2007 16:34:06 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do.
Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were.
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:34:34 GMT -1
I think dumbass is being very generous No you dumbass cos i wont know who lolly picked will i...shell just pm me saying pick a side...i wont know who shes picked though...do you get it Says im who then fucks up the use of the smiley
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Jan 4, 2007 16:34:52 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do. Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were. Its your idea so its your call as far as im concerned
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:35:30 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do. Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were. Indeed Rule and I did it...
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Jan 4, 2007 16:35:31 GMT -1
Can I be number 8 please? You can indeed! Wooo Oi SF, Lolly's game, Lolly's rules
|
|
|
Post by Rulesaints on Jan 4, 2007 16:35:32 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do. Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were. I'm sure people trust you. They could have the same argument by saying you looked at the list before assigning teams to numbers. The fairest way is Lee's but that'll take time
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:35:55 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do. Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were. Its your idea so its your call as far as im concerned And me
|
|
|
Post by StortfordSpur on Jan 4, 2007 16:36:25 GMT -1
Wooo Oi SF, Lolly's game, Lolly's rules , I want 17 anyway
|
|
|
Post by Tony Yeboah's Lunchbox on Jan 4, 2007 16:37:26 GMT -1
I would pick names out of a hat, but people might think I've cheated if say I get a good team, or the people i know better do. Maybe it's just best to keep the list as it is..seeing as I hardly had any input into which order people were. I'm sure people trust you. They could have the same argument by saying you looked at the list before assigning teams to numbers. The fairest way is Lee's but that'll take time People want things far too instantly....time builds up the tension
|
|
|
Post by Fizzy Bread on Jan 4, 2007 16:37:59 GMT -1
Dunno if this has been suggested and in which case if it has, apologises..
How about everyone has a number, Lolly can deal with that then someone else can give all the teams in the hat a number.. then we just do it like they do on't telly with the offical draw.
|
|
|
Post by Rulesaints on Jan 4, 2007 16:38:16 GMT -1
I'm sure people trust you. They could have the same argument by saying you looked at the list before assigning teams to numbers. The fairest way is Lee's but that'll take time People want things far too instantly....time builds up the tension I don't mind helping out by taking either yours or Lollys place in that process as I have nothing better to do
|
|
|
Post by ESR on Jan 4, 2007 16:38:28 GMT -1
Why doesnt Lolly just keep the list as it is, then change the numbers thats at the side of the names, then Lee can just PM her the list of clubs with a number at the side then match them together
|
|
|
Post by Lollipop on Jan 4, 2007 16:39:02 GMT -1
Ok, I've narrowed it down to 2 options.
Either
Hulsey's way..which is fairer but takes up time or
Keep the list as it is..tis quicker but could be construed as less fair I guess
|
|