|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 21:35:09 GMT -1
Which would you rather win it and why?
Despite being a Leeds fan, I think I'd prefer Man Utd to win it just to show that money isn't everything, and to stop Chelsea dominating English football for seasons to come!
|
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Dec 2, 2006 21:36:47 GMT -1
We gonna have one of these every week?  |
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 21:37:48 GMT -1
If you want...  (just say and stop moaning!)  |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 21:43:26 GMT -1
Chelsea I LOOOOOOOVE them  ... All my family support them since birth bar me and ma dad ... we're the clever ones of course  |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 21:44:03 GMT -1
, I think I'd prefer Man Utd to win it just to show that money isn't everything Tell me how Manchester United do that and Chelsea dont ... ? |
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 21:48:16 GMT -1
, I think I'd prefer Man Utd to win it just to show that money isn't everything Tell me how Manchester United do that and Chelsea dont ... ? Chelsea have a mutli billionaire owner, and get as much money as they need. Man Utd, have made their own money be being succesful over the last 20 years, and have recently been bought by a rich yank, who's nowhere near as rich as abramovich and doesn't put anywhere near as much in. |
|
|
|
Post by Super Danny Webber on Dec 2, 2006 21:51:54 GMT -1
Man Utd - chelsea are too cocky for there own good and man utd play the better football...
|
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 21:54:35 GMT -1
We gonna have one of these every week? I see your point now JJ  Man Utd is the correct answer |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 21:56:17 GMT -1
Tell me how Manchester United do that and Chelsea dont ... ? Chelsea have a mutli billionaire owner, and get as much money as they need. Man Utd, have made their own money be being succesful over the last 20 years, and have recently been bought by a rich yank, who's nowhere near as rich as abramovich and doesn't put anywhere near as much in. Man United have a multi billionaire owner Man United get as much money as they need when they ask for it. Every team has their 'own money' Chelsea have been in the premiership from the start ... Rich yank ... Rich Russian His fault he's not as rich ... Money ... they both pay money left right and center Around £30 million ... Rooney ... Schevechenko Around £20 ... Carrick and Shaun Wright Phillips Not that much different ... Chelsea are better thou |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 21:59:20 GMT -1
|
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 21:59:54 GMT -1
Chelsea have a mutli billionaire owner, and get as much money as they need. Man Utd, have made their own money be being succesful over the last 20 years, and have recently been bought by a rich yank, who's nowhere near as rich as abramovich and doesn't put anywhere near as much in. Man United have a multi billionaire owner Man United get as much money as they need when they ask for it. Every team has their 'own money' Chelsea have been in the premiership from the start ... Rich yank ... Rich Russian His fault he's not as rich ... Money ... they both pay money left right and center Around £30 million ... Rooney ... Schevechenko Around £20 ... Carrick and Shaun Wright Phillips Not that much different ... Chelsea are better thou I don't agree with that. I suppose my simplified point, that you can't argue against is; Man Utd have to an extent made and earned their own success. Chelsea have just recieved a load of money and bought it from being a very average side. |
|
|
|
Post by Super Danny Webber on Dec 2, 2006 22:08:53 GMT -1
Man United have a multi billionaire owner Man United get as much money as they need when they ask for it. Every team has their 'own money' Chelsea have been in the premiership from the start ... Rich yank ... Rich Russian His fault he's not as rich ... Money ... they both pay money left right and center Around £30 million ... Rooney ... Schevechenko Around £20 ... Carrick and Shaun Wright Phillips Not that much different ... Chelsea are better thou I don't agree with that. I suppose my simplified point, that you can't argue against is; Man Utd have to an extent made and earned their own success. Chelsea have just recieved a load of money and bought it from being a very average side. And there fans are the cockiest twats ever  |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:15:13 GMT -1
Man United have a multi billionaire owner Man United get as much money as they need when they ask for it. Every team has their 'own money' Chelsea have been in the premiership from the start ... Rich yank ... Rich Russian His fault he's not as rich ... Money ... they both pay money left right and center Around £30 million ... Rooney ... Schevechenko Around £20 ... Carrick and Shaun Wright Phillips Not that much different ... Chelsea are better thou I don't agree with that. I suppose my simplified point, that you can't argue against is; Man Utd have to an extent made and earned their own success. Chelsea have just recieved a load of money and bought it from being a very average side. Earned their own success ... obviously they had money from somehwere ... every teams had money and not money they have earned (cus that just goes back in the chairmans pockets.) Chelsea were never average ... What would you do if you got money ... spend it or not ... ? ... It's football ... As enough people have said nowadays ... Football is a Business. |
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:22:00 GMT -1
Man Utd built it up over the last 20yrs, and as they got better on the pitch, they got more and more money, they extended their stadium and did a lot of marketing, and now they are one fo the biggest brands in the world.
Chelsea metaphorically, waved a magic wand, wiped all their debts and became a good team. But as a consolation, they are going to be fucked when Abramovich pulls his money out after he gets bored- much to the amusement of the rest of the football leagues.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:28:00 GMT -1
Man Utd built it up over the last 20yrs, and as they got better on the pitch, they got more and more money, they extended their stadium and did a lot of marketing, and now they are one fo the biggest brands in the world. Chelsea metaphorically, waved a magic wand, wiped all their debts and became a good team. But as a consolation, they are going to be fucked when Abramovich pulls his money out after he gets bored- much to the amusement of the rest of the football leagues. I see where your coming from ... England playing at Old Trafford ... Manchester United being World Wide Known ... blah blah blah ... they've died down now ... their still the most famous English team ... but the best ... Chelsea ! ... Even before they got there money as you say ! ... They were a family club ... no glory hunters in sight ... now they have more glory hunters ... people at my school support them when 2/3 years ago they didnt ... but its more man united full of glory hunters that make them not the team they should be, Both great teams ... but think before Ambramovich ... fan base wise ... not as much money ... twat of a chairman ... and they were still in contention ... Great team. |
|
|
|
Post by HURLOCK on Dec 2, 2006 22:30:36 GMT -1
Whilst Chelsea are a great side, I think they're too clinical. Whereas Man U are really playing great and are fluid, so on that basis I go for them
|
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:31:06 GMT -1
Man Utd built it up over the last 20yrs, and as they got better on the pitch, they got more and more money, they extended their stadium and did a lot of marketing, and now they are one fo the biggest brands in the world. Chelsea metaphorically, waved a magic wan d, wiped all their debts and became a good team. But as a consolation, they are going to be fucked when Abramovich pulls his money out after he gets bored- much to the amusement of the rest of the football leagues. I see where your coming from ... England playing at Old Trafford ... Manchester United being World Wide Known ... blah blah blah ... they've died down now ... their still the most famous English team ... but the best ... Chelsea ! ... Even before they got there money as you say ! ... They were a family club ... no glory hunters in sight ... now they have more glory hunters ... people at my school support them when 2/3 years ago they didnt ... but its more man united full of glory hunters that make them not the team they should be, Both great teams ... but think before Ambramovich ... fan base wise ... not as much money ... twat of a chairman ... and they were still in contention ... Great team. They've died down, yet they're sitting 6pts clear of Chelsea at the top of the premiership? As for glory supporters. Have you not noticed the sudden increase in Chelsea 'fans'? |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:45:38 GMT -1
Ermmm did I just state there that Chelsea have had theres and some of the people in my school have only started supporting them in the last 2/3 years ... shows that you didnt read the post you spoon |
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:46:52 GMT -1
6 points an Chelsea have a game in hand ... Stil 3 points ... but whats 3 points in football like that nowadays ? |
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:47:16 GMT -1
Ermmm did I just state there that Chelsea have had theres and some of the people in my school have only started supporting them in the last 2/3 years ... shows that you didnt read the post you spoon I'm confused... Lets just say I win! |
|
...
