|
Post by Stan on Jun 11, 2007 11:35:13 GMT -1
Fine, I just thought you might want to disuss the pros and cons of cladding for brick buildings. Cladding for brick buildings... why bother with the bricks then...? Love you H....
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Jun 11, 2007 11:38:50 GMT -1
Fine, I just thought you might want to disuss the pros and cons of cladding for brick buildings. It's a con perpetuated by pikies!! Topics for this afto include ........ 1)Can a sentence without a truth-value ever be approximately true? 2)Methodological naturalism without metaphysical naturalism 3)Was I supposed to take LSD before watching Titanic?
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 11, 2007 11:48:35 GMT -1
Fine, I just thought you might want to disuss the pros and cons of cladding for brick buildings. It's a con perpetuated by pikies!! Topics for this afto include ........ 1)Can a sentence without a truth-value ever be approximately true? 2)Methodological naturalism without metaphysical naturalism 3)Was I supposed to take LSD before watching Titanic? Ooo option c please.
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Jun 11, 2007 12:10:09 GMT -1
It's a con perpetuated by pikies!! Topics for this afto include ........ 1)Can a sentence without a truth-value ever be approximately true? 2)Methodological naturalism without metaphysical naturalism 3)Was I supposed to take LSD before watching Titanic? Ooo option c please. The Titanic paradox was an interesting one. Never had a film won so many awards, while at the same time being one of the biggest piles of festering puss ever made. The studio's magnificant publicity machine nearly pulled of the improbable, and got very close to the holy grail of 'polishing a turd'. The smoke and mirrors stuff meant that, at release the film was receiving near universally positive reviews, and it was a certainty the film would sweep the Oscars. Under 3 years after it's release, it was voted the worst film ever made ........ and rightly so. I have seen Titanic while drunk and high and also while not under the influence ........ and I would heartily recommend the former but not the latter ...... definitely not the latter!!
|
|
|
Post by addicted2venos on Jun 11, 2007 12:10:37 GMT -1
It's a con perpetuated by pikies!! Topics for this afto include ........ 1)Can a sentence without a truth-value ever be approximately true? 2)Methodological naturalism without metaphysical naturalism 3)Was I supposed to take LSD before watching Titanic? Ooo option c please. Your turn!!
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 11, 2007 12:20:45 GMT -1
The Titanic paradox was an interesting one. Never had a film won so many awards, while at the same time being one of the biggest piles of festering puss ever made. The studio's magnificant publicity machine nearly pulled of the improbable, and got very close to the holy grail of 'polishing a turd'. The smoke and mirrors stuff meant that, at release the film was receiving near universally positive reviews, and it was a certainty the film would sweep the Oscars. Under 3 years after it's release, it was voted the worst film ever made ........ and rightly so. I have seen Titanic while drunk and high and also while not under the influence ........ and I would heartily recommend the former but not the latter ...... definitely not the latter!! I agree it it truly bad and the acting is worse that Hollyoaks. Although I have never had the pleasure of watching it under the influence I have seen it at the cinema where many people burst into tears. To this days I don't know whether it was because they were touched by the dying Leo on a raft or because of the general dirge.
|
|
|
Post by C@V on Jun 12, 2007 7:10:26 GMT -1
Today's word is............Harangued. It's meaning is:
1. a scolding or a long or intense verbal attack; diatribe. 2. a long, passionate, and vehement speech, esp. one delivered before a public gathering. 3. any long, pompous speech or writing of a tediously hortatory or didactic nature; sermonising lecture or discourse.
Thank you team and prey you're not harangued by me!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 12, 2007 7:40:50 GMT -1
Today's word is............ Harangued. It's meaning is: 1. a scolding or a long or intense verbal attack; diatribe. 2. a long, passionate, and vehement speech, esp. one delivered before a public gathering. 3. any long, pompous speech or writing of a tediously hortatory or didactic nature; sermonising lecture or discourse. Thank you team and prey you're not harangued by me!!!! ;D Prey1. an animal hunted or seized for food, esp. by a carnivorous animal. 2. a person or thing that is the victim of an enemy, a swindler, a disease, etc.; gull. 3. the action or habit of preying: a beast of prey.4. Archaic. booty or plunder. –verb (used without object)5. to seize and devour prey, as an animal does (usually fol. by on or upon): Foxes prey on rabbits.6. to make raids or attacks for booty or plunder: The Vikings preyed on coastal settlements.7. to exert a harmful or destructive influence: His worries preyed upon his mind.8. to victimize another or others (usually fol. by on or upon): loan sharks that prey upon the poor.I believe you meant 'pray' there Cav
|
|
|
Post by Mrs H on Jun 12, 2007 8:09:29 GMT -1
Lol Morning Neko
|
|
gt
Non League Player (someone crap, like Boston)
Posts: 51
|
Post by gt on Jun 12, 2007 8:14:01 GMT -1
Well done on spotting CAV's deliberate mistake - he was just testing our powers of observation!
|
|
|
Post by C@V on Jun 12, 2007 8:15:33 GMT -1
Well done on spotting CAV's deliberate mistake - he was just testing our powers of observation! That is correct GT and I'm pleased to say that Neko was sharp for so early in the morning. I see this thread is really starting to help everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Ninja Squirrel on Jun 12, 2007 8:19:12 GMT -1
Today's word is............ Harangued. It's meaning is: 1. a scolding or a long or intense verbal attack; diatribe. 2. a long, passionate, and vehement speech, esp. one delivered before a public gathering. 3. any long, pompous speech or writing of a tediously hortatory or didactic nature; sermonising lecture or discourse. Thank you team and prey you're not harangued by me!!!! ;D Number 3 is second nature to myself in my letter writing at work the use of long pompous speech s the norm for law firms though they have started a canmpaign for real English as a lot of simpletons can not understand Lawyers letters.
|
|
|
Post by C@V on Jun 12, 2007 8:20:44 GMT -1
Today's word is............ Harangued. It's meaning is: 1. a scolding or a long or intense verbal attack; diatribe. 2. a long, passionate, and vehement speech, esp. one delivered before a public gathering. 3. any long, pompous speech or writing of a tediously hortatory or didactic nature; sermonising lecture or discourse. Thank you team and prey you're not harangued by me!!!! ;D Number 3 is second nature to myself in my letter writing at work the use of long pompous speech s the norm for law firms though they have started a canmpaign for real English as a lot of simpletons can not understand Lawyers letters. Interesting spelling of campaign! I weep for those you represent!
|
|
|
Post by Ninja Squirrel on Jun 12, 2007 8:21:47 GMT -1
Number 3 is second nature to myself in my letter writing at work the use of long pompous speech s the norm for law firms though they have started a canmpaign for real English as a lot of simpletons can not understand Lawyers letters. Interesting spelling of campaign! I weep for those you represent! Crying for yourself then Cav ;D
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 12, 2007 10:04:52 GMT -1
Well done on spotting CAV's deliberate mistake - he was just testing our powers of observation! If he intends to educate us, he should be leading by example, not throwing in deliberate mistakes at this stage. After all, if we're presently of such an inferior intellect, we shouldn't be expected to spot them! He is either a poor teacher or his claims are spurious (and I mean that in the original sense, not the bastardised 606 version). I suggest the boycotting of his lessons with immediate effect
|
|
|
Post by Stan on Jun 12, 2007 10:05:56 GMT -1
Well done on spotting CAV's deliberate mistake - he was just testing our powers of observation! If he intends to educate us, he should be leading by example, not throwing in deliberate mistakes at this stage. After all, if we're presently of such an inferior intellect, we shouldn't be expected to spot them! He is either a poor teacher or his claims are spurious (and I mean that in the original sense, not the bastardised 606 version). I suggest the boycotting of his lessons with immediate effect Bitch!
|
|
|
Post by Neko Bazu on Jun 12, 2007 10:09:23 GMT -1
If he intends to educate us, he should be leading by example, not throwing in deliberate mistakes at this stage. After all, if we're presently of such an inferior intellect, we shouldn't be expected to spot them! He is either a poor teacher or his claims are spurious (and I mean that in the original sense, not the bastardised 606 version). I suggest the boycotting of his lessons with immediate effect Bitch! I'll scratch his eyes out! ;D
|
|
|
Post by C@V on Jun 12, 2007 13:39:17 GMT -1
Bitch! I'll scratch his eyes out! ;D Don't mess with me Neko or I'll rip your piercings out and and make you eat dreadlocks!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Post by Imp on Jun 12, 2007 13:41:11 GMT -1
I'll scratch his eyes out! ;D Don't mess with me Neko or I'll rip your piercings out and and make you eat dreadlocks!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO How can one so erudite be so violent?
|
|
|
Post by C@V on Jun 12, 2007 13:45:01 GMT -1
Don't mess with me Neko or I'll rip your piercings out and and make you eat dreadlocks!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO How can one so erudite be so violent? Have you not seen Clockwork Orange?
|
|