|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:52:01 GMT -1
Ermmm lets not Chelsea do ... or a draw like the actual game turned out
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:53:03 GMT -1
...or we could jsut look at the little poll, and on JJ's on the prem board, and see that I'm right so: ssshhhhhh!
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:53:15 GMT -1
... They were a family club ... no glory hunters in sight ... now they have more glory hunters ... people at my school support them when 2/3 years ago they didnt ... but its more man united full of glory hunters that make them not the team they should be, As for glory supporters. Have you not noticed the sudden increase in Chelsea 'fans'? Point ?
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:53:48 GMT -1
...or we could jsut look at the little poll, and on JJ's on the prem board, and see that I'm right so: ssshhhhhh! Or I could just say that you're thick ... with my post just above this one
|
|
|
Post by Super Danny Webber on Dec 2, 2006 22:54:19 GMT -1
WALS is right...
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:55:34 GMT -1
As for glory supporters. Have you not noticed the sudden increase in Chelsea 'fans'? Point ? My point is thta Man Utd wern't just funded by glory supporters, like you suggested earlier!
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:56:08 GMT -1
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:57:03 GMT -1
Just cus you two chavs stick together
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 22:57:53 GMT -1
Point ? My point is thta Man Utd wern't just funded by glory supporters, like you suggested earlier! Excuse me Looove ... did I ever 'suggest' that Man United were JUST FUNDED by glory hunters ... did I say that they were ever FUNDED by GLORY Hunters ... ... Point ?
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 22:59:19 GMT -1
My point is thta Man Utd wern't just funded by glory supporters, like you suggested earlier! Excuse me Looove ... did I ever 'suggest' that Man United were JUST FUNDED by glory hunters ... did I say that they were ever FUNDED by GLORY Hunters ... ... Point ? The tone of your earlier posts did insinuate that opinion, yes. ( posh words )
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 23:01:19 GMT -1
Excuse me Looove ... did I ever 'suggest' that Man United were JUST FUNDED by glory hunters ... did I say that they were ever FUNDED by GLORY Hunters ... ... Point ? The tone of your earlier posts did insinuate that opinion, yes. ( posh words ) tone ... ? Can a list of words have a tone ... Well then your 'insination' if that is a word ... was ... wrong ... Spooner !
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 23:01:43 GMT -1
I think I've taken 3 points out of this
|
|
|
Post by weallloveleeds on Dec 2, 2006 23:04:12 GMT -1
I think you've just bull-shiited your way through the argument so that I no longer know what I'm arguing against!
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 23:07:16 GMT -1
I havent bullshitted at all MR ... I only tell tha truth ... Well thats your fault for being soo stooooooopid
|
|
|
Post by Super Danny Webber on Dec 2, 2006 23:07:28 GMT -1
hush geeks!
|
|
|
Post by Jodie. on Dec 2, 2006 23:09:17 GMT -1
Says you.
|
|
|
Post by mortontheblade on Dec 3, 2006 0:52:22 GMT -1
neither!
COME ON YOU BLADES!!!
|
|
|
Post by MozzaBedfordSpur on Dec 3, 2006 9:31:00 GMT -1
I used to detest Man Utd but I am rooting for them, I despise Chelsea nearly as much as the Foreign legion (goon chavs) they whinge, complain, cheat, and have no class, come on Man Utd.
|
|
|
Post by Giar on Dec 3, 2006 9:37:14 GMT -1
i dont like either but im going for united cause i want to the top to to at least be entertaining again instead of chelsea's boring play by numbers tactics. at least united try and play with flair
|
|
gt
Non League Player (someone crap, like Boston)
Posts: 51
|
Post by gt on Dec 3, 2006 9:41:36 GMT -1
Man U for me I used to have a soft spot for Chelsea in the early to mid 90's but I don't like their attitude these days I've never had a massive problem with Man U, it's Liverpool I detest
|
|